The Supreme Court has changed the landscape of electoral bonds by annulling the controversial plan, which is undoubtedly a boon for supporters of transparency and a setback for dark politics.
Human Rights Activists & Election Commissioners Retired Express the Verdict as Landmark
The ex-chief election commissioners and activists alike have hailed the Supreme Court decision to remove the electoral bond scheme hoping that it is a big step towards ensuring fairness and transparency in the electoral process.
In-depth Analysis: The Indian Democracy at a Crossroads
The proclamation of the end of the electoral bonds scheme by the Communist Party of India (Marxists) together with the Association for Democratic Reforms was an amazing move that showed the urgency of political and electoral funding reforms. However, what was the reason of such change and what consequences will it hold for the whole nation?
Unveiling the Veil: Defacing Anonymity on the Banks for Designated Money
The previous CEC Navin Chawla warned of the adverse consequence the scheme might have on the Indian political system by stating that the layer of anonymity granted contributors and political parties an unfair advantage. The move is regarded as a major rip-off of the shroud that has covered the voting process finances for so long.
ADR’s Triumph: Supreme Court Supported the Growing Indian’s Democracy
Prof. Trilochan Sastry, the Chairman and Member of ADR, described the judgment as “a landmark” and appreciated the sophistication of the Indian democracy. This verdict is not only a legal triumph but also a recognition of the values for the sake of which the freedom fight unfolded, giving a fresh breath of air to the ants of open governance.
The main reason for the reform and what changes it will entail
As the scheme of electoral bonds is breaking down, doubts are raised about whether these reforms are necessary and their effect on the country. Whether this verdict initiates the creation of a transparent and accountable political terrain is determined by this court. Will it change the funding of political campaigns or does it influence the dynamics of electoral funding? The verdict still is not out there, but for now, it represents a ringing triumph for those fighting for a more open and fair democratic system.
