Revanna has to visit the court to follow a notice from the Special Investigation Team to investigate allegations of sexual harassment. It is a question of honour as he is the son of H. D. Deve Gowda, who was the former PM.
H. D. Revanna is a former Minister of Karnataka, and on Thursday, he filed for bail in the People’s Representative Court regarding a sexual harassment case. According to a report, his son, Prajwal Revanna, is also connected with the case. On Friday, the court has scheduled a hearing on this matter. Revanna’s counsel replied that although bailable sections are mentioned, a petition has been filed with the trial court to include rape charges when the court asked about why he hadn’t directly appeared before the relevant court despite the FIR containing bailable sections. According to a news report, the specifics of this submission are currently unavailable.
Revanna is the son of former Prime Minister and also JD(S) patriarch H D Deve Gowda. Revanna has to visit the court to follow a notice from the Special Investigation Team to investigate allegations of sexual harassment. Prajwal is accused of misbehaving with a woman, which instigated the state government to form the SIT to delve into the matter. In recent days, numerous explicit video clips have surfaced in Hassan where the 33-year-old MP was clearly featured. On April 26, he participated as the NDA candidate in the Hassan Lok Sabha constituency, where voting took place.
A cook complained against Revanna and Prajwal, and following the matter, a notice was issued to them. Under the sections of 354 (A), (D), 506, and 509 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Holenarasi-pura police filed a case against Revanna and his son Prajwal Revanna, following a complaint by a 47-year-old victim.In a recent development, the Centre replied to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in which it requested to cancel Prajwal Revanna’s diplomatic passport. The spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Randhir Jaiswal, informed the state government that the passport could only be abrogated upon court order.
